UN Agenda 21 - Spooky shit

Affidavit filed with FBI linking Rockefeller BioTech Group with H1N1 "Plan-demic"...

Remember last week when the CEO of the $28 Billion Dollar
Rockefeller & Co.Investments was mysteriously found shot
to death in his car behind a Dartmouth, Massachuset's
strip mall on a Sunday afternoon?

Fifty six year old James McDonald was President and CEO of
Rockefeller & Co. and showed no signs of depression, or
despair, and left no suicide note.

http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/09/16/2009-09-16_prominent_ceo_adviser_to_the_wealthy_dies_in_apparent_suicide.html

------------

Well today, the "Rockefeller story" got more interesting as
investigative journalist Sheri Kane and Dr. Leonard Horowitz
filed an affidavit with the FBI linking the "creation" and
the "release" of the new H1N1 virus to a "private global
biotechnology trust" linked to David Rockefeller and other
global financiers.

Kane and Horowitz turned up some interesting links between
media titans, globalist financiers, drug companies, and the
government...in addition to the very disturbing revelation
that they are pre-releasing forms of the virus into the
population...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14921

7.I have reviewed the records and files cited herein and
attest to the following facts that evidence fraud, official
malfeasance, organized crime, and the administration of
genocide (i.e., iatro-genocide) operating under the guise
of ?public health? within a "trust organization" established
by David Rockefeller called ?Partnership for New York City...?


9.It is a well-established fact that ?outbreaks? have been
caused by laboratory ?accidents.? For instance, the 1977
Influenza A outbreak of human (?swine flu?) H1N1 that went
extinct for twenty years between 1957 and 1977 suddenly re-
emerged immediately following: a. the suspicious unexplained
1976 military outbreak at Fort Dix, New Jersey of this strain
that was most likely a covert military experiment; and b. the
subsequent swine flu deadly vaccination program that followed
the Fort Dix outbreak, and media-driven fright; that has been
attributed to a ?laboratory source? according to doctors
Zimmer and Burke in the New England Journal of Medicine
(July 16, 2009;Vol.361:279-285). (See EXHIBIT 1)

10. The November 1977 sudden reemergence of this Influenza A
H1N1 strain in the former Soviet Union is best explained by
the National Cancer Institute?s 1978 publication titled
Special Virus Cancer Program (Library call number:
E20.3152;V81/977 and 78-21195). This report revealed the June
15, 1976 contract (N01-CP-6-1047) with the American Type
Culture Collection to supply ?virus materials . . . to
investigators throughout the world? via a ?US-USSR Agreement?
(a dangerous breach of Cold War national security). (See:
EXHIBITS_2-3.pdf) Virus materials cited in this document
included numerous infectious agents including influenza,
parainfluenza, and even laboratory recombinations of influenza
with acute lymphocytic leukemia viruses that might spread
quick acting lymphatic cancers by sneezing.(See: EXHIBIT_4.pdf)

11. The April, 2009 ?outbreak? of the H1N1 ?swine flu? is,
like the 1976 Fort Dix and 1977 general ?outbreaks,? highly
suspicious according to genetic analysts and leading
virologists. The rapid mutation rates of the novel agent
circulating and feared as the 2009 ?swine flu? strongly
suggests a laboratory source, either intentionally or
accidentally released.

12.To make it more difficult for the public to comprehend what
is ongoing in flu labs, according to EXHIBIT_5.pdf, World
Health Organization officials developed new terminology to
describe viruses used in vaccinations, gene therapies, and
advancing biotechnologies. The new terms ?reference
materials,? ?biosimilars,? ?data packages,? and ?mock-up
files,? each designate viruses and/or viral materials
including gene sequences that cause disease and immune system
reactions.

13.According to EXHIBIT_6.pdf, World Health Organization
officials in charge of developing influenza vaccines, Dr.
James Robertson and Dr. John Wood, of the National Institute
for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) in the UK,
testified (April, 2006) that ?if a pandemic is imminent, . . .
A stockpile of live vaccine, . . . could be used to prime the
population in advance . . .?

[Let me make sure I have this right. Declare a pandemic
is imminent (which they are in the process of doing) and then
they are going to pre-release the live virus into the
population, which will guarantee a pandemic?!?!

Can you say - "plausible deniability" and cover for a bio-
attack on the population?]

14.According to this document, these doctors are
the ?Principal Scientists in the Division of Virology at
NIBSC. Dr. Wood and Dr. Robertson lead the NIBSC?s influenza
group. Their responsibilities include the control and
standardization of influenza vaccines. On behalf of the United
Nations? World Health Organization (WHO) the NIBSC is involved
in the serological testing of vaccine trials; the preparation
and distribution of influenza viruses to vaccine
manufacturers; and the coordination of EU strain selection
process.? (ie., the selection of viruses that shall be used by
governments worldwide, and their ?vaccine pipelines.?

15.Dr. Robertson also testified that ?there is a lack of
vaccine research in the UK compared with the US,? and that he
and Dr. Wood ?consider that pandemic vaccine development in
the EU has been slow due to limited public funding. This is in
contrast to the situation in the USA. Dr. Wood told the group
that the NIBSC collaborate with the vaccine industry . . .
The EMEA have helped to persuade industry to invest in
pandemic vaccines with the introduction of the mock up files
and by waiving the regulatory fees . . .? [Emphasis added]

17.Thus, it is certain that when the Mexican Swine Flu
2009 ?outbreak? occurred in mid April, 2009, first in the
United States in two unrelated children living approximately
100 miles apart in southern California, then soon after in
Mexico among people who had not been exposed to these two
children, that foul play is a most reasonable explanation,
especially since this unique virus held genes from avian,
swine, Spanish, and regular flu strains?unprecedented in the
history of ?natural selection? health science addressing
evolution of the species.

20.a.Days before the media?s first reported swine flu cases in
April, 2009, Novavax Corporation, partnered with the General
Electric (GE) company that co-owns NewCo with media mogul
Rupert Murdoch, issued press releases generating widespread
publicity.

b.Thus, America?s most powerful news media consortium, and
cable television conglomerate, publicized Novavax?s vaccine
research in collaboration with CDC officials, alleging their
vaccine protected against this unprecedented recombination of
flu stains?avian, Spanish flu, and regular flu infections.
(See EXHIBIT_7.pdf)

c.According to Dr. Robertson?s testimony presented above,
Novavax received its ?biosimulars? through CDC Influenza
Branch director, Ruben O. Donis, and Dr. Rick Bright. Dr.
Bright previously worked with Dr. Donis at the CDC. In April,
2009, Dr. Bright was Novavax?s Vice President of Global
Influenza Programs.

d.The publicized outbreak caused Novavax?s stock to soar.
Novavax?s CEO, Rahul Singhvi, and his previous corporate
affiliate, the Merck Pharmaceutical company that manufactures
the flu-related pneumonia vaccine (Pneumovax), both profited
heavily from the ?outbreak,? media coverage, and declared
advancing pandemic.

e.No group in the world other than the Anglo-American
vaccine ?pipeline,? with its faucets at the NIBSC and CDC,
could supply Novavax?s collaborators with the wherewithal to
manufacture and release the recombinant virus reported by
officials and Reuter?s News Service. (See: EXHIBIT_8.pdf)

Rockefeller, Kissinger, Big Pharma, Rupert Murdoch
family connections, and Eugenics...

f.A Google search proves Thomas H. Glocer is the Chief
Executive Officer of the Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRC) and
Director of the TRC that partnered in David Rockefeller?s
biotechnology trust called ?Partnership for New York City,?
(PNYC). Thomas H. Glocer is also a Merck [pharmaceutical
company] Director since 2007, according the Merck company
website. (See: EXHIBIT_9.pdf.)

i.Rupert Murdock is Co-Chairman with Honorary Co-Chairman
David Rockefeller in the PNYC.

j.Rupert Murdock?s mother, Elisabeth Murdock is Dame Commander
of the Order of the British Empire, established by King George V;
a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC), which is an order established
by Elizabeth II, Queen of Australia. Elisabeth Murdock administers the
Royal Woman?s Hospital in Victoria, Australia, a vaccine research center
and heavy promoter of the swine flu vaccines and drugs for pregnant women.

k.Jerry I Speyer, owner of the Rockefeller Center, is chair emeritus of the
PNYC and on their board of directors. He is Chairman and Co-Chief
Executive Officer of Tishman Speyer, Chairman of the Museum of
Modern Art, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York; chairman emeritus of Columbia University; chairman
emeritus of the Real Estate Board of New York; and a member of the
David Rockefeller-directed Council on Foreign Relations.

l.Nelson Rockefeller?s prot?g?, Dr. Henry Kissinger, is a highly influential
member of The Council on Foreign Relations, composed of the most influential
business leaders in America, and his Kissinger Associates, Inc. is Merck
and Company, Inc.?s leading management consulting firm.

m.Merck and Company, Inc. is the world?s largest vaccine maker. The
company not only profits from flu frights and pandemics by sales of
Pneumovax, but also is credited for having spread the AIDS virus,
HIV, through contaminated hepatitis B vaccines according to research
published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Medical Hypotheses
(Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 677-686) by this affiant.

n.Further evidencing an Anglo-American conspiracy to commit iatro-genocide
using vaccines, a CSL Biotherapies report (See: EXHIBIT_10.pdf) proves this
firm operates one of the world?s largest influenza vaccine manufacturing
facilities for supply to Australia and global markets. This facility is based
in Parkville, Victoria. This document explains the vaccine
process and exclusive supply of viruses for vaccine research and manufacture
from the WHO or the CDC, thusly:

?The first step in making the influenza vaccine is preparing a ?seed? virus.

This is a safe form of the influenza virus, which can be grown in hens? eggs
to produce the vaccine. Preparation of the seed takes around 3-4 weeks
following receipt of a potential candidate virus from international health
bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) or the US Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).?

o.So Ruben O. Donis at the CDC had to have sent the H1N1 and H5N1
viruses needed for vaccine manufacture to Novavax, where the CDC?s
former Dr. Rick Bright, is now implicated in this conspiracy to commit
genocide by way of flu vaccines.

p.CSL?s primary H1N1 swine flu vaccine testing site is closely linked to
Rupert Murdock. Murdock funds the Murdock Children?s Research
Institute (MCRI) of Victoria, Australia. His daughter-in-law, Sarah Murdock,
is an Ambassador for the MCRI, and a member of its development board
since 2000. Murdock?s mother?s, Royal Woman?s Hospital is testing the
H1N1 vaccines, at the time of this writing, on children and pregnant women.

q.The Associate Director of Clinical Development for vaccines at CSL is
Dr. Michael Greenberg. CSL is conducting H1N1 vaccine studies on babies
at the Murdock Children?s Research Institute, according to the MCRI website.
(See:EXHIBIT_10.pdf) Dr. Greenberg joined GlaxoSmithKline in 2005, and
CSL in 2009, further evidencing Rupert Murdock?s ties to SmithKline and CSL.

r.The MCRI is the largest child health research and vaccine testing institute in
Australia. It researches childhood diseases, including many that are vaccine-induced
autoimmune diseases associated with antigenic complex formation from geneto-protein
recombinations and blood intoxications.

s.Antigenic complex formation is the primary mechanism recognized by
immunologists for the generation of myriad auto-immune diseases that result
from vaccine-induced/unnatural over-stimulation of the immune system
whereafter immune cells are hyper-activated to autogenically attack the body
instead of simply the infectious agent/ pathogen or antigen. The medical
community calls this auto-immune dysfunction.

---------------

This follows Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister's lawsuit in June charging
that Baxter AG, an Austrian subsidiary of Baxter International deliberately sent
out "live" deadly bird flu virus to 16 laboratories in four countries.

?Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus?

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html

By Helen Branswell, THE CANADIAN PRESS

Last Updated: 27th February 2009, 3:26pm

http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html

"Burgermeiter alleges that Baxter AG, Austrian subsidiary of Baxter International,
deliberately sent out 72 kilos of live bird flu virus, supplied by the WHO in the
winter of 2009 to 16 laboratories in four counties. She claims this evidence
offers clear proof that the pharmaceutical companies and international government
agencies themselves are actively engaged in producing, developing, manufacturing
and distributing biological agents classified as the most deadly bioweapons
on earth in order to trigger a pandemic and cause mass death.

In her April charges, she noted that Baxter's lab in Austria, one of the supposedly
most secure biosecurity labs in the world, did not adhere to the most basic and
essential steps to keep 72 kilos of a pathogen classified as a bioweapon secure
and separate from all other substances under stringent biosecurity level regulations,
but it allowed it to be mixed with the ordinary human flu virus and sent from its
facilities in Orth in the Donau.

In February, when a staff member at BioTest in the Czech Republic tested the
material meant for candidate vaccines on ferrets, the ferrets died. This incident
was not followed up by any investigation from the WHO, EU, or Austrian health
authorities. There was no investigation of the content of the virus material,
and there is no data on the genetic sequence of the virus released.

In answer to parliamentary questions on May 20th, the Austrian Health Minister,
Alois Stoger, revealed that the incident had been handled not as a biosecurity lapse,
as it should have been, but as an offence against the veterinary code. A veterinary
doctor was sent to the lab for a brief inspection.

Burgermeister's dossier reveals that the release of the virus was to be an
essential step for triggering a pandemic that would allow the WHO to
declare a Level 6 Pandemic. She lists the laws and decrees that would
allow the UN and WHO to take over the United States in the event of
pandemic. In addition, legislation requiring compliance with mandatory
vaccinations would be put into force in the U.S. under conditions of
pandemic declaration.

She charges that the entire "swine flu" pandemic business is premised on a
massive lie that there is no natural virus out there that poses a threat to the
population. She presents evidence leading to the belief that the bird flu and
swine flu viruses have, in fact, been bio-engineered in laboratories using funding
supplied by the WHO and other government agencies, among others. This
"swine flu" is a hybrid of part swine flu, part human flu and part bird flu,
something that can only come from laboratories according to many experts."

---------------

Now let's review what we have as facts...

-- Baxter did get caught releasing "live" deadly bird flu vaccine
to 16 labs in four different countries in what virtually
everyone refers to as an "impossible" accident given modern
bio-lab protocols.

-- We have a money trail connecting and benefiting Big Money,
Big Pharma, Big Media, and Big Government.

-- The government is now on record saying that it will
pre-release virus into the population to "prime" it
ahead of a pandemic.

-- And credible (if not irrefutable evidence) that this virus
was created in the lab.

If you are still on the fence about the "obvious" evidence
that this is a laboratory creation... watch the only film
ever allowed to be made showing "Dr. Death" Johan Huhlin
actually digging up corpses in the Alaskan permafrost to
recover samples of the deadly Spanish Flu virus from 1918.

I wonder won't they show this PBS special on air any longer?

Flu Time Bomb ? The PBS Documentary with ?Dr. Death,?
Johan Hultin

"They Dug the 1918 Spanish Flu out of the permafrost and this
is the only video ever released about it..."

http://atomicnewsreview.org/2009/09/15/

Even more important that that PBS documentary, is the documentary
film made by Dr. Leonard Horowitz...

"In Lies We Trust"

If you want proof, and proof that you can hear from Big Pharma
and government bio-weapons scientists with your own eyes and ears
that will knock you off the "conspiracy theory vs. reality" fence,
this is it...

-- National Security Memorandum 200 & 46, and Henry Kissinger's
globalist desire for massive population reduction.

-- You know about Tuskeegee, and maybe even the Puerto Rico
cancer studies, but do you know about the DOD's secret agreement
with Congress on "uninformed consent" and ongoing testing on
the US population?

-- How present vaccines cause very profitable future cancer epidemics.

-- Using chemical and biological "intoxication"

-- Using disease as a weapon: Slow kill = more profits than war.

-- The truth about Ft. Dietrick.

-- Dr. Robert Gallo, Litton Industries, and Aids.

-- The reason we knew Saddam Hussein had bio-weapons,
is because we gave them to him (you'll want to see this...)

-- Vaccinations are not the same as immunizations and you
need to know the difference.

-- B.M.I., a Washington D.C. company you probably never heard of,
and there's a reason why...

-- History's most relevant lesson for today: Every single pandemic in
modern history has occurred during major social and economic upheaval.

"IN LIES WE TRUST"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8674401787208020885#

[You will want to download a copy of this film and make DVD
copies to share with others..]

---------------

And then there's this from the London Guardian today:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/20/swine-flu-costs-un-report

"UN report says pandemic may result in anarchy unless
western world pays for antiviral drugs and vaccines"

"The swine flu pandemic could kill millions and cause anarchy
in the world's poorest nations unless ?900m can be raised from rich countries
to pay for vaccines and antiviral medicines, says a UN report leaked to the Observer.

The disclosure will provoke concerns that health officials will not be able to stem
the growth of the worldwide H1N1 pandemic in developing countries. If the virus
takes hold in the poorest nations, millions could die and the economies of fragile
countries could be destroyed.

Health ministers around the globe were sent the warning on Thursday in a report
on the costs of averting a humanitarian disaster in the next few months. It comes
as officials inside the World Health Organisation, the UN's public health body,
said they feared they would not be able to raise half that amount because of the
global downturn..."

-----------------

Also fwiw, CNN is running a piece on the urgency for global
population reduction as I type this... along with an ongoing
series about "Is Al Qaeda ready to attack within the US again?"

...not so subtle ?programming.?

-----------------

And did notice what the "hot stock of the day" was today?

It was CHIP, as in VeriChip...

Up +143% today.




http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS84281+21-Sep-2009+BW20090921

Reuters
September 21, 2009

Shares of VeriChip Corp (CHIP.O) tripled after the company said it had been
granted an exclusive license to two patents, which will help it to develop
implantable virus detection systems in humans.

The patents, held by VeriChip partner Receptors LLC, relate to bio-sensors
that can detect the H1N1 and other viruses, and biological threats such as
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, VeriChip said in a statement.

The technology will combine with VeriChip?s implantable radio frequency
identification devices to develop virus triage detection systems.

The triage system will provide multiple levels of identification ? the first
will identify the agent as virus or non-virus, the second level will classify
the virus and alert the user to the presence of pandemic threat viruses and
the third level will identify the precise pathogen, VeriChip said in a
white paper published May 7, 2009.

---------------

And did you see this from Boston?

They're going to use bracelets and track flu shot recipients
via a database and neighborhood grids.

Good thing they got GPS readings on everyones front door
a year before the census wasn't it?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/21/boston_launches_flu_shot_tracking/

"When people arrive for their shots, they will get an ID bracelet with a barcode.

Next, basic information - name, age, gender, address - will be entered into the
patient tracking database. There will be electronic records, too, of who gave the
vaccine and whether it was injected into the right arm or the left, and time-stamped
for that day.

-----------------

And in case you think Boston is an anomaly, check this out,
because it's clear that VeriChip has ?BIG PLANS?...

VeriChip also just made a recent acquisition of the company
"Steel Vault" and will form a new company called "PositiveID."

VeriChip Corporation, headquartered in Delray Beach, Florida,
has developed the "VeriMed Health Link System" which uses the
first human-implantable passive RFID microchip, cleared for
medical use in October 2004 by the FDA.

Also, the US Military was doing multi-national drills with 20 foreign countries
over 12 days in Panama, in a Flu Pandemic response exercise called PANAMAX 2009.

http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=48357

Story Number: NNS090918-14
Release Date: 9/18/2009 2:40:00 PM

By Mass Communication Specialist David P. Coleman,
FA PANAMAX 2009 Public Affairs

PANAMA CITY, Panama (NNS) -- Representatives from 10 U.S. government
agencies are holding a two-day table-top exercise in cooperation with the government
of Panama to assist in responding to any future influenza pandemic Sept. 16.

The agency representatives are in Panama in conjunction with Fuerzas Aliadas
PANAMAX 2009, a 12-day military security training exercise involving 20 countries.

The agencies present included the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security,
Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Federal Aviation Administration,
U.S. Agency for International Development, Department of Health and Human Services,
U.S. Army, U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Navy.

-------------------

That of course follows FEMA's "NLE 09" exercise in July which
featured foreign troops from over 10 nations on US soil, doing
anti-terrorism drills.

http://www.fema.gov/media/fact_sheets/nle09.shtm

And it wasn't just the FEMA NLE 09 drill. From tanks on city
streets in Illinois, to lockdown drills at High Schools in Texas,
to the Military shutting down public highways and doing
checkpoint drills in Tennessee, to house to house gun confiscation drills
in Iowa, to foreign troops landing on beaches in Jacksonville, Florida.




And this isn't just a "media" psy-op, because they're spending
hundreds of millions moving troops all over the world...
as they're ramping up the domestic police state like it's
DefCon 2 and Martial Law is imminent.

So why all the plans and drills for a pandemic that does not
yet exist, and may not occur... and who (or, what) are they
really afraid of?

I'll tell you who and what they're afraid of.

They're afraid of you, and they're afraid that you're going
to discover what the CBO and David Walker have already discovered,
and they're afraid that you're not going to take it very well.

America now has over $90 Trillion Dollars in debt, deficits, and
unfunded liabilities to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid,
that the CBO and former comptroller general David Walker say
are now so large, that the benefits can not be delivered,
and the debts can not be repaid.

All because corrupt politicians long ago looted the Social Security
and Medicare piggy bank. And because Hank Paulson and the
Federal Reserve extorted Congress out of $23.7 trillion dollars in
bailouts and backstops for their ponzi schemes.

And now the world is calling for the replacement of the US dollar
and threatening to boycott Treasury auctions, while US home prices
are still falling, unemployment is still rising, and Wall Street insiders
are dumping stocks at a record pace.

All while Obama's makes a power grab of another 17% of US GDP
via socializing health care... while the final economic kill shot for the
US economy (and windfall for Goldman, Gore, UN & Chicago cronies)
? Cap & Trade, waits in the wings.

Are the pixels starting to form a picture for you yet?

SOTB

PS: Local and national talk radio today was dominated by
callers phoning in with reports of employers requiring
them to take mandatory flu vaccinations as a condition
of keeping their job.
.
It appears that Obama's Hegelian dialetic will be that the
"US Government" won't require that you take the flu shot,
but your employer, or the UN's WHO under the "Model States"
agreement will...

Aren't familiar with the UN's "Model State Emergency Heath Powers Act"
program (MSEHPA)?

...you;d better be (because Obama sure as hell isn't going to tell you about it).

http://getdclu.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/the-model-state-emergency-health-powers-act-the-source-of-fear-about-pandemic-planning/

Tick, Tock...

Just like a hurricane, you don't want to start planning
the night before landfall.

Plan ahead, because they have...

"A viable political substitute for war must posit a
'generalized' external menace to society of a nature and
degree sufficient to require the organization and acceptance
of political authority."

And if you haven't watched it, watch it now...

"IN LIES WE TRUST"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8674401787208020885#

"A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at
the present North American material standard of living would
be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living,
2 to 3 billion would be possible."

- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment


?A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline
from present levels, would be ideal.?

- Ted Turner, founder of CNN who gave the UN $1 billion dollars
for population control.


?? the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more
than 500 million but less than one billion.?

- Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind


"One America burdens the earth much more than twenty
Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say in order to
stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people
per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad
not to say it."

- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO


"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need
is the right major crisis."

- David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive manager


"Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound
reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world
has ever experienced - a major shift in the priorities of both
governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment
of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that
a concern for the environmental consequences of every human
action be integrated into individual and collective decision-
making at every level."

- UN Agenda 21


Welcome to Agenda 21

Cap and Tax

Goebbels, err Obama's Climate Change Lies And Propaganda...


Do we need to adopt better energy conservation practices,
pursue alternative energy sources, and reign in un-regulated
pollution from China, India, and the developing third world?

Yes, obviously so.

But, what we don't need to do, is to allow the political
agenda of climate change to become a Trojan Horse for
global governance, and a mechanism for the ongoing transfer
of wealth from the people, to a select group of multi-national
corporations, globalist bankers, UN insiders, and the
Chicago cronies of Barack Obama...

http://www.sliderontheblack.com/politics-money-and-markets/waxman-markley-cap-trade-bill/

Just take a look who the profiteers behind Cap & Trade are?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9629

?Obama?s involvement in Chicago Climate Exchange
?the rest of the Climate Change story?

By Judi McLeod Wednesday, March 25, 2009

?Obama Years Ago Helped Fund Carbon Program He Is Now Pushing
Through Congress? is a FOXNews story by Ed Barnes.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/25/obama-helped-fund-carbon-scheme/

In short, ?While on the board of a Chicago-based charity,
Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will
likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon
reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress
as president.?

The charity was the Joyce Foundation on whose board of
directors Obama served and which gave nearly $1.1 million in
two separate grants that were ?instrumental in developing and
launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which
now calls itself ?North America?s only cap and trade system
for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and
projects worldwide.?

And that?s only the beginning of this tawdry tale, Mr. Barnes.

The ?privately-owned? Chicago Climate Exchange is heavily
influenced by Obama cohorts Al Gore and Maurice Strong.

For years now Strong and Gore have been cashing in on that
lucrative cottage industry known as man-made global warming.

Strong is on the board of directors of the Chicago Climate
Exchange, Wikipedia-described as ?the world?s first and North
America?s only legally binding greenhouse gas emission
registry reduction system for emission sources and offset
projects in North America and Brazil.?

Gore, self-proclaimed Patron Saint of the Environment, buys
his carbon off-sets from himself?the Generation Investment
Management LLP, ?an independent, private, owner-managed
partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and
Washington, D.C., of which he is both chairman and founding
partner. The Generation Investment Management business has
considerable influence over the major carbon credit trading
firms that currently exist, including the Chicago Climate
Exchange.

Strong, the silent partner, is a man whose name often draws a
blank on the Washington cocktail circuit. Even though a
former Secretary General of the 1992 United Nations Conference
on Environment and Development (the much hyped Rio Earth
Summit) and Under-Secretary General of the United Nations in
the days of an Oil-for-Food beleaguered Kofi Annan, the
Canadian born Strong is little known in the United States.

That?s because he spends most of his time in China where he he
has been working to make the communist country the world?s
next superpower. The nondescript Strong, nonetheless is the
big cheese in the underworld of climate change and is one of
the main architects of the failing Kyoto Protocol.

Full credit for the expose on the business partnership of
Strong and Gore in the cap-and-trade reduction scheme should
go to the investigative acumen of the Executive Intelligence
Review (EIR).

The tawdry tale of the top two global warming gurus in the
business world goes all the way back to Earth Day, April 17,
1995 when the future author of ?An Inconvenient Truth?
travelled to Fall River, Massachusetts, to deliver a green
sermon at the headquarters of Molten Metal Technology Inc.
(MMTI). MMTI was a firm that proclaimed to have invented a
process for recycling metals from waste. Gore praised the
Molten Metal firm as a pioneer in the kind of innovative
technology that can save the environment, and make money for
investors at the same time.

?Gore left a few facts out of his speech that day,? wrote
EIR. ?First, the firm was run by Strong and a group of Gore
intimates, including Peter Knight, the firm?s registered
lobbyist, and Gore?s former top Senate aide.?

(Fast-forward to the present day and ask yourself why it is
that every time someone picks up another Senate rock, another
serpent comes slithering out).

?Second, the company had received more than $25 million in
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and development
grants, but had failed to prove that the technology worked on
a commercial scale. The company would go on to receive
another $8 million in federal taxpayers? cash, at that point,
its only source of revenue.

?With Al Gore?s Earth Day as a Wall Street calling card,
Molten Metal?s stock value soared to $35 a share, a range it
maintained through October 1996. But along the way, DOE
scientists had balked at further funding. When in March 1996,
corporate officers concluded that the federal cash cow was
about to run dry, they took action: Between that date and
October 1996, seven corporate officers?including Maurice
strong?sold off $15.3 million in personal shares in the
company, at top market value. On Oct. 20, 1996?a Sunday?the
company issued a press release, announcing for the first time,
that DOE funding would be vastly scaled back, and reported the
bad news on a conference call with stockbrokers.

?On Monday, the stock plunged by 49%, soon landing at $5 a
share. By early 1997, furious stockholders had filed a class
action suit against the company and its directors.

Ironically, one of the class action lawyers had tangled with
Maurice strong in another insider trading case, involving a
Swiss company called AZL Resources, chaired by Strong, who was
also a lead shareholder. The AZL case closely mirrored Molten
Metal, and in the end, Strong and the other AZL partners
agreed to pay $5 million to dodge a jury verdict, when
eyewitness evidence surfaced of Strong?s role in scamming the
value of the company stock up into the stratosphere, before
selling it off.

In 1997, Strong went on to accept from Tongsun Park, who was
found guilty of illegally acting as an Iraqi agent, $1 million
from Saddam Hussein, which was invested in Cordex Petroleum
Inc., a company he owned with his son, Fred.

These are the leaders in the Man-made Global Warming Movement,
who three years later were to be funded by the man who was to
become President of the United States of America.

If we follow the time line on where Obama was during the
funding of the Chicago Climate Exchange, he was still a
professor at the University of Chicago Law School teaching
constitutional law, with his law license becoming inactive a
year later in 2002.

It may be interesting to note that the Chicago Climate
Exchange in spite of its hype, is a veritable rat?s nest of
cronyism.

The largest shareholder in the Exchange is Goldman Sachs.

Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley is its honorary chairman, The
Joyce Foundation, which funded the Exchange also funded money
for John Ayers? Chicago School Initiatives. John is the
brother of William Ayers.

What a flap when it was discovered that the senator from
Chicago had nursed on Saul Alinsky?s milk, had his political
career launched at a coffee party held by domestic terrorist
Bill Ayers, and sat for 20 years, uncomplaining in front of
the ?God-dam-America pulpit of resentment-challenged Jeremiah
Wright.

Folk were naturally outraged that the empty suit who would go
on to become TOTUS was spawned from such anti-American activism.

But the media should have been hollering, ?Stop Thief!? instead.

The same Chicago Climate Exchange promoting public rip-off was
funded by Obama before he was POTUS.

Even as man-made global warming is being exposed as a money-
generating hoax, Obama is working feverishly to push the
controversial cap-and-trade carbon reduction scheme through
Congress.

Obama was never the character he created for himself in the
fairy-tale version in ?Dreams of My Father?. He?s the agent
of Change and Hope for cohorts making money down at the
Chicago Climate Exchange.

The Barbarians are pushing at the gate of the Global Warming
fraud, and to borrow a line from children playing Hide and
Seek, Here they come, ready or not!


---------------

The entire global warming agenda, which because of the
non-cooperation by mother Earth, had to be changed to
"climate change" and now "sustainability" was created out
of thin air by the globalist Think Tank "The Club of Rome"
in their White Paper/Book "The First Global Revolution"
which openly admits to it being a completely manufactured
crisis, and a mechanism for political change, and wealth
transfer. They even talked about the need to find a new
"common enemy" to unite the people behind government.

Quick Darwin DNA test...

Al Gore didn't invent "Global Warming" or the internet.

Al Gore is a salesman.

Barack Obama is a salesman.

These are not their agendas and you need to know
both the real players, and the playbooks.

Remember Huxley saying that one day, we would love our enslavement?

Are you starting to understand the psychology behind "selling" this?

Here's a quote from the Club of Rome from their own playbook:

?In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the
idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.?

- Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

Along with additional quotes from leading environmental
NGO's, foundations, and Think Tanks acknowledging the hoax
of global warming, and climate change...

?We need to get some broad based support, to capture the
public?s imagination? So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention
of any doubts? Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.?
- Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports

?Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.?
- Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC

?It doesn?t matter what is true, it only matters what people
believe is true.?
- Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

"We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the
theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right
thing in terms of economic and environmental policy."
- Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony,
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring
about justice and equality in the world."
-Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment

-------------

"It doesn't matter if it's real or not..."

"We've to ride this global warming issue..."

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony..."

Are the pixels forming a clear picture for you yet?

Mechanisms for the transfer of wealth.

A private central bank ... in 1913.

And Cap & Trade with privately owned carbon exchanges... in 2009.

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.

SOTB

The Great Americian Bubble Machine

*THE GREAT AMERICAN BUBBLE MACHINE*_

/From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression - and they're about to do it again

By MATT TAIBBI/

The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled-dry American empire, reads like a Who's Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.

By now, most of us know the major players. As George Bush's last Treasury secretary, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson was the architect of the bailout, a suspiciously self-serving plan to funnel trillions of Your Dollars to a handful of his old friends on Wall Street. Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton's former Treasury secretary, spent 26 years at Goldman before becoming chairman of Citigroup - which in turn got a $300 billion taxpayer bailout from Paulson. There's John Thain, the rear end in a top hat chief of Merrill Lynch who bought an $87,000 area rug for his office as his company was imploding; a former Goldman banker, Thain enjoyed a multibillion-dollar handout from Paulson, who used billions in taxpayer funds to help Bank of America rescue Thain's sorry company. And Robert Steel, the former Goldmanite head of Wachovia, scored himself and his fellow executives $225 million in golden parachute payments as his bank was self-destructing. There's Joshua Bolten, Bush's chief of staff during the bailout, and Mark Patterson, the current Treasury chief of staff, who was a Goldman lobbyist just a year ago, and Ed Liddy, the former Goldman director whom Paulson put in charge of bailed-out insurance giant AIG, which forked over $13 billion to Goldman after Liddy came on board. The heads of the Canadian and Italian national banks are Goldman alums, as is the head of the World Bank, the head of the New York Stock Exchange, the last two heads of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York - which, incidentally, is now in charge of overseeing Goldman - not to mention ...

But then, any attempt to construct a narrative around all the former Goldmanites in influential positions quickly becomes an absurd and pointless exercise, like trying to make a list of everything. What you need to know is the big picture: If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain - an extremely unfortunate loophole in the system of Western democratic capitalism, which never foresaw that in a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.

The bank's unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump-and-dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere - high gas prices, rising consumer-credit rates, half-eaten pension funds, mass layoffs, future taxes to pay off bailouts. All that money that you're losing, it's going somewhere, and in both a literal and a figurative sense, Goldman Sachs is where it's going: The bank is a huge, highly sophisticated engine for converting the useful, deployed wealth of society into the least useful, most wasteful and insoluble substance on Earth - pure profit for rich individuals.

They achieve this using the same playbook over and over again. The formula is relatively simple: Goldman positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble, selling investments they know are crap. Then they hoover up vast sums from the middle and lower floors of society with the aid of a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules in exchange for the relative pennies the bank throws at political patronage. Finally, when it all goes bust, leaving millions of ordinary citizens broke and starving, they begin the entire process over again, riding in to rescue us all by lending us back our own money at interest, selling themselves as men above greed, just a bunch of really smart guys keeping the wheels greased. They've been pulling this same stunt over and over since the 1920s - and now they're preparing to do it again, creating what may be the biggest and most audacious bubble yet.

If you want to understand how we got into this financial crisis, you have to first understand where all the money went - and in order to understand that, you need to understand what Goldman has already gotten away with. It is a history exactly five bubbles long - including last year's strange and seemingly inexplicable spike in the price of oil. There were a lot of losers in each of those bubbles, and in the bailout that followed. But Goldman wasn't one of them.

/IF AMERICA IS NOW CIRCLING THE DRAIN, GOLDMAN SACHS HAS FOUND A WAY TO BE THAT DRAIN./

*BUBBLE #1 - THE GREAT DEPRESSION*
Goldman wasn't always a too-big-to-fail Wall Street behemoth, the ruthless face of kill-or-be-killed capitalism on steroids - just almost always. The bank was actually founded in 1869 by a German immigrant named Marcus Goldman, who built it up with his son-in-law Samuel Sachs. They were pioneers in the use of commercial paper, which is just a fancy way of saying they made money lending out short-term IOUs to small-time vendors in downtown Manhattan.

You can probably guess the basic plotline of Goldman's first 100 years in business: plucky, immigrant-led investment bank beats the odds, pulls itself up by its bootstraps, makes shitloads of money. In that ancient history there's really only one episode that bears scrutiny now, in light of more recent events: Goldman's disastrous foray into the speculative mania of pre-crash Wall Street in the late 1920s.

This great Hindenburg of financial history has a few features that might sound familiar. Back then, the main financial tool used to bilk investors was called an "investment trust." Similar to modern mutual funds, the trusts took the cash of investors large and small and (theoretically, at least) invested it in a smorgasbord of Wall Street securities, though the securities and amounts were often kept hidden from the public. So a regular guy could invest $10 or $100 in a trust and feel like he was a big player. Much as in the 1990s, when new vehicles like day trading and e-trading attracted reams of new suckers from the sticks who wanted to feel like big shots, investment trusts roped a new generation of regular-guy investors into the speculation game.

Beginning a pattern that would repeat itself over and over again, Goldman got into the investment-trust game late, then jumped in with both feet and went hog-wild. The first effort was the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation; the bank issued a million shares at $100 apiece, bought all those shares with its own money and then sold 90 percent of them to the hungry public at $104. The trading corporation then relentlessly bought shares in itself, bidding the price up further and further. Eventually it dumped part of its holdings and sponsored a new trust, the Shenandoah Corporation, issuing millions more in shares in that fund - which in turn sponsored yet another trust called the Blue Ridge Corporation. In this way, each investment trust served as a front for an endless investment pyramid: Goldman hiding behind Goldman hiding behind Goldman. Of the 7,250,000 initial shares of Blue Ridge, 6,250,000 were actually owned by Shenandoah - which, of course, was in large part owned by Goldman Trading.

The end result (ask yourself if this sounds familiar) was a daisy chain of borrowed money, one exquisitely vulnerable to a decline in performance anywhere along the line; The basic idea isn't hard to follow. You take a dollar and borrow nine against it; then you take that $10 fund and borrow $90; then you take your $100 fund and, so long as the public is still lending, borrow and invest $900. If the last fund in the line starts to lose value, you no longer have the money to pay back your investors, and everyone gets massacred.

In a chapter from The Great Crash, 1929 titled "In Goldman Sachs We Trust," the famed economist John Kenneth Galbraith held up the Blue Ridge and Shenandoah trusts as classic examples of the insanity of leverage-based investment. The trusts, he wrote, were a major cause of the market's historic crash; in today's dollars, the losses the bank suffered totaled $475 billion. "It is difficult not to marvel at the imagination which was implicit in this gargantuan insanity," Galbraith observed, sounding like Keith Olbermann in an ascot. "If there must be madness, something may be said for having it on a heroic scale."

*BUBBLE #2 - TECH STOCKS*
Fast-Forward about 65 years. Goldman not only survived the crash that wiped out so many of the investors it duped, it went on to become the chief underwriter to the country's wealthiest and most powerful corporations. Thanks to Sidney Weinberg, who rose from the rank of janitor's assistant to head the firm, Goldman became the pioneer of the initial public offering, one of the principal and most lucrative means by which companies raise money. During the 1970s and 1980s, Goldman may not have been the planet-eating Death Star of political influence it is today, but it was a top-drawer firm that had a reputation for attracting the very smartest talent on the Street.

It also, oddly enough, had a reputation for relatively solid ethics and a patient approach to investment that shunned the fast buck; its executives were trained to adopt the firm's mantra, "long-term greedy." One former Goldman banker who left the firm in the early Nineties recalls seeing his superiors give up a very profitable deal on the grounds that it was a long-term loser. "We gave back money to 'grownup' corporate clients who had made bad deals with us," he says. "Everything we did was legal and fair - but 'long-term greedy' said we didn't want to make such a profit at the clients' collective expense that we spoiled the marketplace."

But then, something happened. It's hard to say what it was exactly; it might have been the fact that Goldman's co-chairman in the early Nineties, Robert Rubin, followed Bill Clinton to the White House, where he directed the National Economic Council and eventually became Treasury secretary. While the American media fell in love with the story line of a pair of baby-boomer, Sixties-child, Fleetwood Mac yuppies nesting in the White House, it also nursed an undisguised crush on Rubin, who was hyped as without a doubt the smartest person ever to walk the face of the Earth, with Newton, Einstein, Mozart and Kant running far behind.

Rubin was the prototypical Goldman banker. He was probably born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed permanently frozen just short of an apology for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exterior; the only human feeling you could imagine him experiencing was a nightmare about being forced to fly coach. It became almost a national cliche that whatever Rubin thought was best for the economy - a phenomenon that reached its apex in 1999, when Rubin appeared on the cover of Time with his Treasury deputy, Larry Summers, and Fed chief Alan Greenspan under the headline THE COMMITTEE TO SAVE THE WORLD. And "what Rubin thought," mostly, was that the American economy, and in particular the financial markets, were over-regulated and needed to be set free. During his tenure at Treasury, the Clinton White House made a series of moves that would have drastic consequences for the global economy - beginning with Rubin's complete and total failure to regulate his old firm during its first mad dash for obscene short-term profits.

The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren't much more than pot-fueled ideas scrawled on napkins by up-too-late bong-smokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for megamillions. It was as if banks like Goldman were wrapping ribbons around watermelons, tossing them out 50-story windows and opening the phones for bids. In this game you were a winner only if you took your money out before the melon hit the pavement.

It sounds obvious now, but what the average investor didn't know at the time was that the banks had changed the rules of the game, making the deals look better than they actually were. They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system - one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman's later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry's standards of quality control.

"Since the Depression, there were strict underwriting guidelines that Wall Street adhered to when taking a company public," says one prominent hedge-fund manager. "The company had to be in business for a minimum of five years, and it had to show profitability for three consecutive years. But Wall Street took these guidelines and threw them in the trash." Goldman completed the snow job by pumping up the sham stocks: "Their analysts were out there saying Bullshit.com is worth $100 a share."

The problem was, nobody told investors that the rules had changed. "Everyone on the inside knew," the manager says. "Bob Rubin sure as hell knew what the underwriting standards were. They'd been intact since the 1930s."

Jay Ritter, a professor of finance at the University of Florida who specializes in IPOs, says banks like Goldman knew full well that many of the public offerings they were touting would never make a dime. "In the early Eighties, the major underwriters insisted on three years of profitability. Then it was one year, then it was a quarter. By the time of the Internet bubble, they were not even requiring profitability in the foreseeable future."

Goldman has denied that it changed its underwriting standards during the Internet years, but its own statistics belie the claim. Just as it did with the investment trust in the 1920s, Goldman started slow and finished crazy in the Internet years. After it took a little-known company with weak financials called Yahoo! public in 1996, once the tech boom had already begun, Goldman quickly became the IPO king of the Internet era. Of the 24 companies it took public in 1997, a third were losing money at the time of the IPO. In 1999, at the height of the boom, it took 47 companies public, including stillborns like Webvan and eToys, investment offerings that were in many ways the modern equivalents of Blue Ridge and Shenandoah. The following year, it underwrote 18 companies in the first four months, 14 of which were money losers at the time. As a leading underwriter of Internet stocks during the boom, Goldman provided profits far more volatile than those of its competitors: In 1999, the average Goldman IPO leapt 281 percent above its offering price, compared to the Wall Street average of 181 percent.

How did Goldman achieve such extraordinary results? One answer is that they used a practice called "laddering," which is just a fancy way of saying they manipulated the share price of new offerings. Here's how it works: Say you're Goldman Sachs, and Bullshit.com comes to you and asks you to take their company public. You agree on the usual terms: You'll price the stock, determine how many shares should be released and take the Bullshit.com CEO on a "road show" to schmooze investors, all in exchange for a substantial fee (typically six to seven percent of
the amount raised). You then promise your best clients the right to buy big chunks of the IPO at the low offering price - let's say Bullshit.com's starting share price is $15 - in exchange for a promise that they will buy more shares later on the open market. That seemingly simple demand gives you inside knowledge of the IPO's future, knowledge that wasn't disclosed to the day-trader schmucks who only had the prospectus to go by: You know that certain of your clients who bought X amount of shares at $15 are also going to buy Y more shares at $20 or $25, virtually guaranteeing that the price is going to go to $25 and beyond. In this way, Goldman could artificially jack up the new company's price, which of course was to the bank's benefit - a six percent fee of a $500 million IPO is serious money.

Goldman was repeatedly sued by shareholders for engaging in laddering in a variety of Internet IPOs, including Webvan and NetZero. The deceptive practices also caught the attention of Nichol as Maier, the syndicate manager of Cramer & Co., the hedge fund run at the time by the now-famous chattering television rear end in a top hat Jim Cramer, himself a Goldman alum. Maier told the SEC that while working for Cramer between 1996 and 1998, he was repeatedly forced to engage in laddering practices during IPO deals with Goldman.

"Goldman, from what I witnessed, they were the worst perpetrator," Maier said. "They totally fueled the bubble. And it's specifically that kind of behavior that has caused the market crash. They built these stocks upon an illegal foundation - manipulated up - and ultimately, it really was the small person who ended up buying in." In 2005, Goldman agreed to pay $40 million for its laddering violations - a puny penalty relative to the enormous profits it made. (Goldman, which has denied wrongdoing in all of the cases it has settled, refused to respond to questions for this story.)

Another practice Goldman engaged in during the Internet boom was "spinning," better known as bribery. Here the investment bank would offer the executives of the newly public company shares at extra-low prices, in exchange for future underwriting business. Banks that engaged in spinning would then undervalue the initial offering price - ensuring that those "hot" opening price shares it had handed out to insiders would be more likely to rise quickly, supplying bigger first-day rewards for the chosen few. So instead of Bullshit.com opening at $20, the bank would approach the Bullshit.com CEO and offer him a million shares of his own company at $18 in exchange for future business - effectively robbing all of Bullshit's new shareholders by diverting cash that should have gone to the company's bottom line into the private bank account of the company's CEO.

In one case, Goldman allegedly gave a multimillion-dollar special offering to eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who later joined Goldman's board, in exchange for future i-banking business. According to a report by the House Financial Services Committee in 2002, Goldman gave special stock offerings to executives in 21 companies that it took public, including Yahoo! co-founder Jerry Yang and two of the great slithering villains of the financial-scandal age - Tyco's Dennis Kozlowski and Enron's Ken Lay. Goldman angrily denounced the report as "an egregious distortion of the facts" - shortly before paying $110 million to settle an investigation into spinning and other manipulations launched by New York state regulators. "The spinning of hot IPO shares was not a harmless corporate perk," then-attorney general Eliot Spitzer said at the time. "Instead, it was an integral part of a fraudulent scheme to win new investment-banking business."

Such practices conspired to turn the Internet bubble into one of the greatest financial disasters in world history: Some $5 trillion of wealth was wiped out on the NASDAQ alone. But the real problem wasn't the money that was lost by shareholders, it was the money gained by investment bankers, who received hefty bonuses for tampering with the market. Instead of teaching Wall Street a lesson that bubbles always deflate, the Internet years demonstrated to bankers that in the age of freely flowing capital and publicly owned financial companies, bubbles are incredibly easy to inflate, and individual bonuses are actually bigger when the mania and the irrationality are greater.

/GOLDMAN SCAMMED HOUSING INVESTORS BY BETTING AGAINST ITS OWN CRAPPY MORTGAGES./

Nowhere was this truer than at Goldman. Between 1999 and 2002, the firm paid out $28.5 billion in compensation and benefits - an average of roughly $350,000 a year per employee. Those numbers are important because the key legacy of the Internet boom is that the economy is now driven in large part by the pursuit of the enormous salaries and bonuses that such bubbles make possible. Goldman's mantra of "long-term greedy" vanished into thin air as the game became about getting your check before the melon hit the pavement.

The market was no longer a rationally managed place to grow real, profitable businesses: It was a huge ocean of Someone Else's Money where bankers hauled in vast sums through whatever means necessary and tried to convert that money into bonuses and payouts as quickly as possible. If you laddered and spun 50 Internet IPOs that went bust within a year, so what? By the time the Securities and Exchange Commission got around to fining your firm $110 million, the yacht you bought with your IPO bonuses was already six years old. Besides, you were probably out of Goldman by then, running the U.S. Treasury or maybe the state of New Jersey. (One of the truly comic moments in the history of America's recent financial collapse came when Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey, who ran Goldman from 1994 to 1999 and left with $320 million in IPO-fattened stock, insisted in 2002 that "I've never even heard the term 'laddering' before.")

For a bank that paid out $7 billion a year in salaries, $110 million fines issued half a decade late were something far less than a deterrent - they were a joke. Once the Internet bubble burst, Goldman had no incentive to reassess its new, profit-driven strategy; it just searched around for another bubble to inflate. As it turns out, it had one ready, thanks in large part to Rubin.

*BUBBLE #3 - THE HOUSING CRAZE*
Goldman's role in the sweeping disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren't in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that poo poo out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and ex-cons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.

None of that would have been possible without investment bankers like Goldman, who created vehicles to package those lovely mortgages and sell them en masse to unsuspecting insurance companies and pension funds. This created a mass market for toxic debt that would never have existed before; in the old days, no bank would have wanted to keep some addict ex-con's mortgage on its books, knowing how likely it was to fail. You can't write these mortgages, in other words, unless you can sell them to someone who doesn't know what they are.

Goldman used two methods to hide the mess they were selling. First, they bundled hundreds of different mortgages into instruments called Collateralized Debt Obligations. Then they sold investors on the idea that, because a bunch of those mortgages would turn out to be OK, there was no reason to worry so much about the lovely ones: The CDO, as a whole, was sound. Thus, junk-rated mortgages were turned into AAA-rated investments. Second, to hedge its own bets, Goldman got companies like AIG to provide insurance - known as credit-default swaps - on the CDOs. The swaps were essentially a racetrack bet between AIG and Goldman: Goldman is betting the ex-cons will default, AIG is betting they won't.

There was only one problem with the deals: All of the wheeling and dealing represented exactly the kind of dangerous speculation that federal regulators are supposed to rein in. Derivatives like CDOs and credit swaps had already caused a series of serious financial calamities: Procter & Gamble and Gibson Greetings both lost fortunes, and Orange County, California, was forced to default in 1994. A report that year by the Government Accountability Office recommended that such financial instruments be tightly regulated - and in 1998, the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a woman named Brooksley Born, agreed. That May, she circulated a letter to business leaders and the Clinton administration suggesting that banks be required to provide greater disclosure in derivatives trades, and maintain reserves to cushion against losses.

More regulation wasn't exactly what Goldman had in mind. "The banks go crazy - they want it stopped," says Michael Greenberger, who worked for Born as director of trading and markets at the CFTC and is now a law professor at the University of Maryland. "Greenspan, Summers, Rubin and [SEC chief Arthur] Levitt want it stopped."

Clinton's reigning economic foursome - "especially Rubin," according to Greenberger - called Born in for a meeting and pleaded their case. She refused to back down, however, and continued to push for more regulation of the derivatives. Then, in June 1998, Rubin went public to denounce her move, eventually recommending that Congress strip the CFTC of its regulatory authority. In 2000, on its last day in session, Congress passed the now-notorious Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which had been inserted into an 1l,000-page spending bill at the last minute, with almost no debate on the floor of the Senate. Banks were now free to trade default swaps with impunity.

But the story didn't end there. AIG, a major purveyor of default swaps, approached the New York State Insurance Department in 2000 and asked whether default swaps would be regulated as insurance. At the time, the office was run by one Neil Levin, a former Goldman vice president, who decided against regulating the swaps. Now freed to underwrite as many housing-based securities and buy as much credit-default protection as it wanted, Goldman went berserk with lending lust. By the peak of the housing boom in 2006, Goldman was underwriting $76.5 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities - a third of which were subprime - much of it to institutional investors like pensions and insurance companies. And in these massive issues of real estate were vast swamps of crap.

Take one $494 million issue that year, GSAMP Trust 2006-S3. Many of the mortgages belonged to second-mortgage borrowers, and the average equity they had in their homes was 0.71 percent. Moreover, 58 percent of the loans included little or no documentation - no names of the borrowers, no addresses of the homes, just zip codes. Yet both of the major ratings agencies, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, rated 93 percent of the issue as investment grade. Moody's projected that less than 10 percent of the loans would default. In reality, 18 percent of the mortgages were in default within 18 months.

Not that Goldman was personally at any risk. The bank might be taking all these hideous, completely irresponsible mortgages from beneath-gangster-status firms like Countrywide and selling them off to municipalities and pensioners - old people, for God's sake - pretending the whole time that it wasn't grade-D horseshit. But even as it was doing so, it was taking short positions in the same market, in essence betting against the same crap it was selling. Even worse, Goldman bragged about it in public. "The mortgage sector continues to be challenged," David Viniar, the bank's chief financial officer, boasted in 2007. "As a result, we took significant markdowns on our long inventory positions .... However, our risk bias in that market was to be short, and that net short position was profitable." In other words, the mortgages it was selling were for chumps. The real money was in betting against those same mortgages.

"That's how audacious these assholes are," says one hedge-fund manager. "At least with other banks, you could say that they were just dumb - they believed what they were selling, and it blew them up. Goldman knew what it was doing." I ask the manager how it could be that selling something to customers that you're actually betting against - particularly when you know more about the weaknesses of those products than the customer - doesn't amount to securities fraud.

"It's exactly securities fraud," he says. "It's the heart of securities fraud."

Eventually, lots of aggrieved investors agreed. In a virtual repeat of the Internet IPO craze, Goldman was hit with a wave of lawsuits after the collapse of the housing bubble, many of which accused the bank of withholding pertinent information about the quality of the mortgages it issued. New York state regulators are suing Goldman and 25 other underwriters for selling bundles of crappy Countrywide mortgages to city and state pension funds, which lost as much as $100 million in the investments. Massachusetts also investigated Goldman for similar misdeeds, acting on behalf of 714 mortgage holders who got stuck ho1ding predatory loans. But once again, Goldman got off virtually scot-free, staving off prosecution by agreeing to pay a paltry $60 million - about what the bank's CDO division made in a day and a half during the real estate boom.

The effects of the housing bubble are well known - it led more or less directly to the collapse of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG, whose toxic portfolio of credit swaps was in significant part composed of the insurance that banks like Goldman bought against their own housing portfolios. In fact, at least $13 billion of the taxpayer money given to AIG in the bailout ultimately went to Goldman, meaning that the bank made out on the housing bubble twice: It hosed the investors who bought their horseshit CDOs by betting against its own crappy product, then it turned around and hosed the taxpayer by making him payoff those same bets.

And once again, while the world was crashing down all around the bank, Goldman made sure it was doing just fine in the compensation department. In 2006, the firm's payroll jumped to $16.5 billion - an average of $622,000 per employee. As a Goldman spokesman explained, "We work very hard here."

But the best was yet to come. While the collapse of the housing bubble sent most of the financial world fleeing for the exits, or to jail, Goldman boldly doubled down - and almost single-handedly created yet another bubble, one the world still barely knows the firm had anything to do with.

*BUBBLE #4 - $4 A GALLON*
By the beginning of 2008, the financial world was in turmoil. Wall Street had spent the past two and a half decades producing one scandal after another, which didn't leave much to sell that wasn't tainted. The terms junk bond, IPO, subprime mortgage and other once-hot financial fare were now firmly associated in the public's mind with scams; the terms credit swaps and CDOs were about to join them. The credit markets were in crisis, and the mantra that had sustained the fantasy economy throughout the Bush years - the notion that housing prices never go down - was now a fully exploded myth, leaving the Street clamoring for a new bullshit paradigm to sling.

Where to go? With the public reluctant to put money in anything that felt like a paper investment, the Street quietly moved the casino to the physical-commodities market - stuff you could touch: corn, coffee, cocoa, wheat and, above all, energy commodities, especially oil. In conjunction with a decline in the dollar, the credit crunch and the housing crash caused a "flight to commodities." Oil futures in particular skyrocketed, as the price of a single barrel went from around $60 in the middle of 2007 to a high of $147 in the summer of 2008.

That summer, as the presidential campaign heated up, the accepted explanation for why gasoline had hit $4.11 a gallon was that there was a problem with the world oil supply. In a classic example of how Republicans and Democrats respond to crises by engaging in fierce exchanges of moronic irrelevancies, John McCain insisted that ending the moratorium on offshore drilling would be "very helpful in the short term," while Barack Obama in typical liberal-arts yuppie style argued that federal investment in hybrid cars was the way out.

/GOLDMAN TURNED A SLEEPY OIL MARKET INTO A GIANT BETTING PARLOR - SPIKING PRICES AT THE PUMP./

But it was all a lie. While the global supply of oil will eventually dry up, the short-term flow has actually been increasing. In the six months before prices spiked, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world oil supply rose from 85.24 million barrels a day to 85.72 million. Over the same period, world oil demand dropped from 86.82 million barrels a day to 86.07 million. Not only was the short-term supply of oil rising, the demand for it was falling - which, in classic economic terms, should have brought prices at the pump down.

So what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help - there were other players in the physical-commodities market - but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures - agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.

As is so often the case, there had been a Depression-era law in place designed specifically to prevent this sort of thing. The commodities market was designed in large part to help farmers: A grower concerned about future price drops could enter into a contract to sell his corn at a certain price for delivery later on, which made him worry less about building up stores of his crop. When no one was buying corn, the farmer could sell to a middleman known as a "traditional speculator," who would store the grain and sell it later, when demand returned. That way, someone was always there to buy from the farmer, even when the market temporarily had no need for his crops.

In 1936, however, Congress recognized that there should never be more speculators in the market than real producers and consumers. If that happened, prices would be affected by something other than supply and demand, and price manipulations would ensue. A new law empowered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission - the very same body that would later try and fail to regulate credit swaps - to place limits on speculative trades in commodities. As a result of the CFTC's oversight, peace and harmony reigned in the commodities markets for more than 50 years.

All that changed in 1991 when, unbeknownst to almost everyone in the world, a Goldman-owned commodities-trading subsidiary called J. Aron wrote to the CFTC and made an unusual argument. Farmers with big stores of corn, Goldman argued, weren't the only ones who needed to hedge their risk against future price drops - Wall Street dealers who made big bets on oil prices also needed to hedge their risk, because, well, they stood to lose a lot too.

This was complete and utter crap - the 1936 law, remember, was specifically designed to maintain distinctions between people who were buying and selling real tangible stuff and people who were trading in paper alone. But the CFTC, amazingly, bought Goldman's argument. It issued the bank a free pass, called the "Bona Fide Hedging" exemption, allowing Goldman's subsidiary to call itself a physical hedger and escape virtually all limits placed on speculators. In the years that followed, the commission would quietly issue 14 similar exemptions to other companies.

Now Goldman and other banks were free to drive more investors into the commodities markets, enabling speculators to place increasingly big bets. That 1991 letter from Goldman more or less directly led to the oil bubble in 2008, when the number of speculators in the market - driven there by fear of the falling dollar and the housing crash - finally overwhelmed the real physical suppliers and consumers. By 2008, at least three quarters of the activity on the commodity exchanges was speculative, according to a congressional staffer who studied the numbers - and that's likely a conservative estimate. By the middle of last summer, despite rising supply and a drop in demand, we were paying $4 a gallon every time we pulled up to the pump.

What is even more amazing is that the letter to Goldman, along with most of the other trading exemptions, was handed out more or less in secret. "I was the head of the division of trading and markets, and Brooksley Born was the chair of the CFTC," says Greenberger, "and neither of us knew this letter was out there." In fact, the letters only came to light by accident. Last year, a staffer for the House Energy and Commerce Committee just happened to be at a briefing when officials from the CFTC made an offhand reference to the exemptions.

"1 had been invited to a briefing the commission was holding on energy," the staffer recounts. "And suddenly in the middle of it, they start saying, 'Yeah, we've been issuing these letters for years now.' I raised my hand and said, 'Really? You issued a letter? Can I see it?' And they were like, 'Duh, duh.' So we went back and forth, and finally they said, 'We have to clear it with Goldman Sachs.' I'm like, 'What do you mean, you
have to clear it with Goldman Sachs?'"

The CFTC cited a rule that prohibited it from releasing any information about a company's current position in the market. But the staffer's request was about a letter that had been issued 17 years earlier. It no longer had anything to do with Goldman's current position. What's more, Section 7 of the 1936 commodities law gives Congress the right to any information it wants from the commission. Still, in a classic example of how complete Goldman's capture of government is, the CFTC waited until it got clearance from the bank before it turned the letter over.

Armed with the semi-secret government exemption, Goldman had become the chief designer of a giant commodities betting parlor. Its Goldman Sachs Commodities Index - which tracks the prices of 24 major commodities but is overwhelmingly weighted toward oil - became the place where pension funds and insurance companies and other institutional investors could make massive long-term bets on commodity prices. Which was all well and good, except for a couple of things. One was that index speculators are mostly "long only" bettors, who seldom if ever take short positions - meaning they only bet on prices to rise. While this kind of behavior is good for a stock market, it's terrible for commodities, because it continually forces prices upward. "If index speculators took short positions as well as long ones, you'd see them pushing prices both up and down," says Michael Masters, a hedge-fund manager who has helped expose the role of investment banks in the manipulation of oil prices. "But they only push prices in one direction: up."

Complicating matters even further was the fact that Goldman itself was cheerleading with all its might for an increase in oil prices. In the beginning of 2008, Arjun Murti, a Goldman analyst, hailed as an "oracle of oil" by The New York Times, predicted a "super spike" in oil prices, forecasting a rise to $200 a barrel. At the time Goldman was heavily invested in oil through its commodities-trading subsidiary, J. Aron; it also owned a stake in a major oil refinery in Kansas, where it warehoused the crude it bought and sold. Even though the supply of oil was keeping pace with demand, Murti continually warned of disruptions to the world oil supply, going so far as to broadcast the fact that he owned two hybrid cars. High prices, the bank insisted, were somehow the fault of the piggish American consumer; in 2005, Goldman analysts insisted that we wouldn't know when oil prices would fall until we knew "when American consumers will stop buying gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and instead seek fuel-efficient alternatives."

But it wasn't the consumption of real oil that was driving up prices - it was the trade in paper oil. By the summer of2008, in fact, commodities speculators had bought and stockpiled enough oil futures to fill 1.1 billion barrels of crude, which meant that speculators owned more future oil on paper than there was real, physical oil stored in all of the country's commercial storage tanks and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve combined. It was a repeat of both the Internet craze and the housing bubble, when Wall Street jacked up present-day profits by selling suckers shares of a fictional fantasy future of endlessly rising prices.

In what was by now a painfully familiar pattern, the oil-commodities melon hit the pavement hard in the summer of 2008, causing a massive loss of wealth; crude prices plunged from $147 to $33. Once again the big losers were ordinary people. The pensioners whose funds invested in this crap got massacred: CalPERS, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, had $1.1 billion in commodities when the crash came. And the damage didn't just come from oil. Soaring food prices driven by the commodities bubble led to catastrophes across the planet, forcing an estimated 100 million people into hunger and sparking food riots throughout the Third World.

Now oil prices are rising again: They shot up 20 percent in the month of May and have nearly doubled so far this year. Once again, the problem is not supply or demand. "The highest supply of oil in the last 20 years is now," says Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan who serves on the House energy committee. "Demand is at a 10-year low. And yet prices are up."

Asked why politicians continue to harp on things like drilling or hybrid cars, when supply and demand have nothing to do with the high prices, Stupak shakes his head. "I think they just don't understand the problem very well," he says. "You can't explain it in 30 seconds, so politicians ignore it."

Wake the fark up....

DNA, IQ, Survival Test...

Wouldn't Christine Roemer make a nice schoolmarm?
I mean... where'd they find her? Central casting?

From CNBC this morning:

"Consumer numbers back up our optimism."

"This is how most recessions end."

DNA/IQ/Survival Test:

This is a _________.


1. Recession.
2. Depression.
3. Pre-planned systemic collapse which will result in historic
socio-economic & geopolitical change, that will forever change
America, your life and that of your children.

While the sheeple remain fixated on Kris Allen & Adam Lambert
and an animal spirits manufactured greenshoots rally...
telling themselves that their home values, 401K's and jobs
will come back... all the while stage left... the US Treasury
is being looted and socialism is being installed in broad daylight,
right under their noses.

Set down your lattes, unplug your iPods, turn off American Idol
and wake the F@%# Up people...

You are sleep walking through the End of America.

Did you see this?

This is their contemptuous answer for our public outcry
on Congress passing the $787 Billiond Dollar Stimulus
Bill without reading it.

This is their "middle finger" answer to America, where
they are literally laughing in our face...

Isn't this funny. How cute...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1q1EoglEBY

This will become the final economic death blow to the
American economy. Cap and trade/carbon taxes...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRcq0Lxffwc

Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman was asked
point blank...

"Did you know that was in this (climate change) bill?"

His answer:

"You asking me? I certainly don't claim to know everything
that's in this bill. We relied very heavily on the scientists
from the IPCC and others... I don't know the details, I rely
on the scientists."

This is yet another U.N. agenda being ram-rodded down our
throats. It will be the final death blow the the American
economy, adding an estimated $3-$4,000 per household in
taxes and fees... and will send US industry, manufacturing
and jobs... running to China and India.

In case you're wondering, they're not even trying to hide
their agenda. It's all in plain sight. But, you won't find it
on American Idol, or ESPN... so here it is:

First, have you noticed how they've changed the "name" from
Global Warming to Climate Change?

Why do you suppose that is?

Maybe because scientist after scientist, and fact after fact,
have shown that there is no global warming?

http://www.heartland.org/full/24851/The_Politics_of_Global_Warming.html

The earth continually goes through warming and cooling cycles.

Over long periods of time climate changes.

Over short periods of time weather changes.

There have been relatively long periods of time when the world
has been colder than it is now.

There have been relatively long periods of time when the world
has been warmer than it is now.

C02 is a trace gas whose presence in the atmosphere can contribute
to an increase in the absorption of thermal radiation.

The increased use of carbon-based fuels has produced significant
increases in the amount of C02 released to the atmosphere,
though still dwarfed by natural sources.

Cooling in the ?20s
Heating in the ?30s and ?40s
Cooling in the ?50s and ?60s and ?70s
Warming in the ?80s and ?90s
And cooling for the past decade

So now, because the cat's out of the bag, it's "climate change."

And watch for yet another change to...

"Sustainability"

Watch how often that word begins to be woven into media talking
points over the coming year.

Let me cut to the chase for the pseudo intellectuals and
the self-absorbed yuppie cognoscenti who've had their
heads up their own self-indulgent asses for the last
twenty years, and who's attention deficit disorder
only allows them to absorb information in 15-30 second
tweets, twitters, and sound bytes...

The U.N. was founded by the old money trusts, international
bankers, and the illuminist & royal families of Europe,
as a front for global government.

John D. Rockefeller donated the land that the United Nations
now sits on. Ironically or, maybe not so... it used to
be the home of a Kosher slaughter house.

From those roots soon grew their foundations and charitable
trusts (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Mellon, Ford etc) which in turn
funded hundreds (now thousands) of Think Tanks, Roundtables,
and NGO groups, which are now accurately referred to as
the "shadow government."

These are the "Thousand Points Of Light" that George H.W. Bush
referred to in his now (in)famous "New World Order" speech.

Through groups such as Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commision,
and the Council On Foreign Relations... the real governance
of the world is carried out.

This is what Eisenhower warned us about...

A world where generals want to be politicians, and where
politicians want to be generals. Where the lines between
the government and the military-industrial complex become
blurred.

And today, it's not just the lines between government and
the military-industrial complex that have become blurred,
but international borders as well.

J.F.K. not only echoed Eisenhower's warnings, he spoke
directly to "secret socities" (Skull & Bones just one,
among many)and vowed to dismantle the CIA and break it
into a thousand pieces.

So much for dismantling the shadow government and the
power of the military-industrial complex.

He was killed just weeks after uttering those words.

Of course this makes both Presidents conspiracy theorists.

Yet today, through the RIIA in Europe and the CFR in the US,
we see both groups dominate not just key cabinet positions
in government, but policy making as well.

Let's get back to Global Warming... Climate Change...
and Sustainability...

First, do you think Al Gore walked out of his 9,000 sq. ft.
home one morning, got into his limo and and then while
shuttling off across the globe on his private jet, had an
epiphany moment about global warming?

I hate to burst your tree hugging bubble, but Al Gore is
a fraud. He no more invented global warming than he did
the internet.

Al Gore was chosen to become the the pitchman. A frontman for
the globalists. And his Nobel Prize was pre-determined to add
credence and momentum to the cause.

After all...

Who would dare question a Nobel Prize winner?

The Nobel Prize gave global warming a near unquestionable
stamp of legitimacy.

Curious as to how the entire "global warming" issue really
came about?

A roundtable group called "The Club Of Rome" was given a
project by the globalists.

Their mandate was to come up with an agenda that would
accelerate the move to global governance, but also transfer
the shift in power and wealth away from America and into
the hands of the globalist bankers.

Because the scope was international, it couldn't be another
World War - a rally around the flag event. They needed
a common enemy for the entire world. And they found one in
man himself... man being the enemy of mother earth.

And here's how they will achieve their agenda.

They have used this strategy to execute nearly all of their
orchestrated agendas over the last two decades:

-- Announce a disaster
-- Cherry pick some results
-- Back it up with computer modeling
-- Proclaim a consensus
-- Stifle the opposition
-- Take over the process and control the funding
-- Roll the policy makers

Here's why you will soon be paying taxes for eating, breathing
and merely being... to globalist bankers.

Here's the Climate Change/UN agenda in their own words...

?All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is
only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be
overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.?
- Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

?Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.?
- Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC*

[IPCC - the group noted by Henry Waxman in the You Tube
Video above, who wrote the new carbon tax bill.]

?Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent
middle class - involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels,
appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not
sustainable.?
- Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit

?A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United
States. De-development means bringing our economic system into
line with the realities of ecology and the world resource
situation.?
- Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies

?The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not
another United States. We can?t let other countries have the
same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have
in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right
where they are.?
- Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

?Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent
of giving an idiot child a machine gun.?
- Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

?Our insatiable drive to rummage deep beneath the surface of
the earth is a willful expansion of our dysfunctional
civilization into Nature.?
- Al Gore, Earth in the Balance

?The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many,
doing too well economically and burning too much oil.?
? Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview

?My three main goals would be to reduce human population to
about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial
infrastructure and see wilderness, with it?s full complement
of species, returning throughout the world.?
-Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

"One America burdens the earth much more than twenty
Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say in order to
stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people
per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad
not to say it."
- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

?Isn?t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized
civilizations collapse? Isn?t it our responsibility to bring
that about??
- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

America stands alone as the last bastion of capitalism,
freedom, and rugged individualism. The antithesis of
everything the UN globalist agenda stands for.

Yet as America, freedom, and capitalism are being dismantled
right before our eyes, we stand idly by and do nothing.

We stand in apathy.

We sit in denial.

We do nothing.

Nothing, as the wealth of our nation was systematically stolen
by the bankster-gangsters through de-regulation and a ponzi
scheme derivatives bubble.

And they did it systematically and by design through ...

-- The Commodity Futures Modernization Act.

-- The repeal of Glass Steagall.

-- Hank Paulsons' Investment Banker coup of the SEC in allowing
self regulation and the removal of leverage limits on capital.

-- Rubin & Summers gold lease/suppression scheme.

-- Greenspans fiat flood and 1% credit orgy.

-- Turning Fannie & Freddie into toxic waste dumps.

-- The Credit & Bond Rating Agency fraud.

-- A CDO/CDS derivatives house of cards.

-- The Naked Short/Rumor Mongering - Bear Raids on Bear Stearns
and Lehman Brothers.

-- Paulson & Bernake's gun to the head/extortion/martial law
heist of $800 Billion Dollars.

-- AIG being used to launder money to Goldman, offshore
hedge funds, and Euro banks like gold manipulator Deutsche Bank.

-- JP Morgan allowed to be the 800 lbs. Derivatives Geurilla
in the room that no one will talk about.

-- A privately owned Fed that refuses to tell Congress, or the
American people where trillions of dollars went.

And here's the tally of their looting so far...

Unfunded Social Security and Medicare Debt -- $65 trillion
U.S. Treasury Bond Debt -- $12 trillion
Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Deficit -- $2 trillion
Total Debt -- $79 trillion

A debt so large (by design) that it can never be repaid.

Interest payments alone now so large, that Thomas Jefferson's
words have now come true...

"If the American people ever allow the banks to control the
issuance of their currency... the banks and corporations that
will grow up around them will deprive the people of all
property, until their children wake up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered."

The damage that's done is done.

The final takedown of America is in progress.

Sitting idly bye as another chapter unfolds is not an option.

When will you say - enough?

When will you say - no?

When will you rise up and act?

If not now, when?

And if not soon...

Your fathers will rue your very existence and your children will
curse your name into eternity. That I promise you.

Conspiracy theory?

Exaggeration?

Think one world government is nonsense, think it isn't
unfolding as you read this, think I've lost my mind?

Read on.

And by the way...

They are willing to "spill blood" to achieve their agenda,
are you willing to spill blood to stop it?

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying
for it in blood as well as in words and money."
- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
Foreign Affairs Magazine (July/August 1995)

"In the 21st century, nations as we know them will be obsolete;
all states will recognize a single, global authority. National
sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
- Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State,
as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for
multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking
interests by seizing control of the political government of
the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a
skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate
the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual
and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is
to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political
governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and
creators of the system, they will rule the future."
- U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

This present window of opportunity, during which a truly
peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will
not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global
transformation. ,b>All we need is the right major crisis and the
nations will accept the New World Order.
- David Rockefeller CFR & Trilateral Commission Founder.

"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch
of a society which originated in England and believes national
boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
- Carroll Quigley, Professor of History Georgetown University,
in his book "Tragedy and Hope".

"The interests behind the Bush administration, such as the
CFR, the Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for
David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberg Group have prepared for
and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within
the next five years."
- Dr. Johannes Koeppl (Former official of the German Ministry
for Defence and advisor to NATO)

"I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used the power
of office, and they are in our Universities and they are in
our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And
if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking
about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking
about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship
and those plans are there!"
- Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas
on August 30th, 2003

25,000 of them and 300 million of us.

And yet many of you hide in fear. Afraid to speak up. Afraid
to attend a Tea Party. Afraid of writing an op-ed in your
local newspaper. Afraid of calling your Congressman. Afraid
of getting on a list. Afraid of what someone will think.

Only 5% of Americans supported the American Revolution,
and only 1% fought for it.

While times change, people never do.

The call has now gone out for the 1%.

And the time is now.

S.O.T.B.